Community Page
- www.mathewingram.com/work Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- "1. Just because the New York Times does something doesn't make it right. 2. Describing something as a rumour, or putting it in the form of a question, doesn't make it OK to...
- Thanks a lot for sharing
- I think this is the dangerous trend we are on that the media only tells people what it wants and attempts to manipulate than allow people to make up their own mines
- It would be nice if we all made our own clothes out of hemp fiber, and used wind power to generate all of our energy, and so on. But that probably isn’t going to happen any time soon either.
- dsfasdfsf
Jump to original thread »
Ted Murphy of PayPerPost has a post up about what appears to be another Google PageRank restructuring, which Ted says is specifically directed at PayPerPost — and posts from Andy Beard at WebProNews and PPP-using sites like Big Foot Marketing and 5xmom.com (whose somewhat unsubtle re
... Continue reading »
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
However for those who has severals blog, can surrender at least 1 of their blog to get index again. But to my case i don't think so.
google is always be GOOOGle but remember if there is no US the user, There is NO google.
So it's high time for ppp,reviewme and others providers to start using others method of measurement.
:) Anyway Nice post. and subscribed your Feeds. will come back again and again matthew,
Regards,
benny
Limadang.com
1 year ago
The biggest problem with this and what got Duncan stirred up is that this is not being applied evenly, and Ted called Techcrunch out on some extremely blatant pagerank passing links.
There has also been a huge amount of collateral damage, site that do not write paid reviews punished just for mentioning PPP, and there is no way to request reconsideration without saying you are guilty of something.
1 year ago
I hope that blog advertising sites implement another method of ranking and i hope avertisers will consider some form of measures other than Google Page Rank for their campaigns.
1 year ago
Can you imagine the outcry if Microsoft had done this? Or look at the rebellion over on Facebook? Why should Google be allowed to essentially prohibit people from making money, even if it doesn't meet with the approval of some? If the issue is passing page rank, why isn't that a penalty applied evenly to all?
1 year ago
1 year ago
How can PPP be penalized when all the big guys do this and get away with it??
Take a look at webmd's site for example. Scroll down to the bottom of the page and right above the bottom search form you'll see "Health Solutions" in big letters and "from our sponsors" in small.
Click on a couple of those links and you tell me if the average user would be able to understand that the article has been paid for and is one big advertisement.
Everyday, I believe more and more the view that "Google is just 'defending their monopolistic stranglehold on search and online advertising,'"
8 months ago
With that being said, I have another website with a page rank of 2 and I am going to see if Pay Per Post will kill my Page Rank on that also. If it does, I will likely quit the program altogether.
Trial and Error my friends. Trial and Error.