-
Website
http://www.mathewingram.com/work -
Original page
http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/20/does-being-transparent-ruin-a-pr-blog/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
StevenHodson
37 comments · 66 points
-
webomatica
35 comments · 5 points
-
howardlindzon
46 comments · 71 points
-
JoeDuck
57 comments · 1 points
-
Karoli
32 comments · 44 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Daily Mirror editor says to forget about SEO
2 weeks ago · 4 comments
-
The Dallas Morning News pulls down the wall
2 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
Peabody Hotel, Memphis
2 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
Video of my TEDx Toronto talk
3 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
Go ahead: Ask me a question
2 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
Daily Mirror editor says to forget about SEO
What a bloody fiasco.
Has any PR firm actually used blogs in an ethical way?
I do think it's possible to use a blog for PR purposes successfully, but I don't think the Edelman Wal-Mart strategy is the way to go in the long run. Companies are going to have to find a way to be up front about who they are and why they are blogging if they want to avoid Edelman Excedrin headaches.
That may require abandoning the notion of securing "grassroots" appeal, and will surely make successful PR blogging tougher...but I do think it's possible.
Wal-Mart should fire Edelman because they are incompetent.
What exactly has Wal-Mart received for their money?
So, its like they've gotten negative value for their money. Which is surprising -- how often do you *pay* PR firms to get BAD publicity?
PR practitioners may never be able to snag the full power of blogging as a WOM device, but they can capture enough of it to make it worthwhile.
Re: Firing Edelman... Makes sense to me. Wal-Mart really needs to consider firing everyone who has ever been involved in their online pursuits. Their actual commerce pages are less than attractive, their faux MySpace tanked, and now this. Maybe some outfits should just stick to brick and mortar?
CDB
blogs in an ethical way?\" is -- yes, sure. Here are two examples:
-- General Motors\' Fastlane Blog [1] -- its success is the result of the
collaboration between GM and Hass MS&L; [2]. The two companies have won
the 2006 PR Week Awards for Best Use of the Internet [3] and PR
Innovation of the Year [4] for this project.
--the Chocolate Blog [5], launched to support the LG Chocolate Phone
blogger relations program. The blog was/is written by three members of
Hill & Knowlton’s UK social media team; their identity [6] and the fact
they are writing for a client [7] were made clear from the start [8],
and one of the H&K; bloggers, Niall Cook, has discussed what they learned
[9] from this program on his blog.
[1] http://fastlane.gmblogs.com
[2] their blog: http://www.blogworks.org
[3] PR Week Awards/Best Use - http://tinyurl.com/y4t5px
[4] PR Week Awards/Innovation: http://tinyurl.com/y3wwsw
[5] http://chocolate.lgbloggers.com
[6] identity disclosure: http://tinyurl.com/yx4b97
[7] client disclosure: http://tinyurl.com/y8w42h
[8] disclosure from the start: http://tinyurl.com/y4wr3t
[9] lessons learned: http://tinyurl.com/y3alm7
Let me rephrase the question:
Has any PR firm had success with using blogs when the client was swirling in controversy, and may actually have something to hide? (perhaps Scoble's own blog is an example ... hmmm .... )
I haven't seen any evidence that this will discourage future attempts, huffing and puffing from blog evangelists to the contrary.
WOMMA is like an Alcoholics Anonymous that says members can drink on special occasions.
Wal-Mart was doing fine until it started listening to the snake oil salesmen. People didn't always like them, but at least it was honest.
Blogs should give PRs an opportunity to leak some more light into the real facts, but I feel that TOTAL transparency will ruin PR!
Thank you for sharing this story with me !