-
Website
http://www.mathewingram.com/work -
Original page
http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/15/do-journalists-need-or-want-publish2/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
scrawledinwax
23 comments · 1 points
-
webomatica
35 comments · 5 points
-
howardlindzon
46 comments · 69 points
-
JoeDuck
57 comments · 1 points
-
Karoli
32 comments · 39 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
In defence of newspapers and serendipity
2 weeks ago · 43 comments
-
Are independent bloggers an endangered species?
2 weeks ago · 8 comments
-
Bloggers, trust, MSM and correction fluid
1 week ago · 2 comments
-
Video: My panel with Shirky and Keen
1 month ago · 2 comments
-
Why media outlets want Facebook Connect
2 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
In defence of newspapers and serendipity
I'm curious. I know this is an old post (on this blog) but anybody want to explain for me the benefits of Publish2 over the other services I've listed?
In practice, Publish 2 is very much like Delicious or Diigo, but Scott's idea was to try and get journalists in particular to use a social tool, so that their bookmarks could be aggregated as a news-gathering tool.
So it's really just a specialized version of a social bookmarking tool, and you are right that its real utility doesn't become obvious until a bunch of journalists are using it regularly. There's an example of what becomes possible at that point in a recent blog post at Publish2: http://blog.publish2.com/2009/01/09/networked-l...
I guess I can see how it works for groups of journalists, and I don't doubt its usefulness for journalists who are just getting into social bookmarking and link journalism. For me though, I guess I'm too entrenched in Diigo and Delicious to switch over.
Of course, my opinion of Twitter was "meh" at first too, but then I came back to it with a vengeance. Perhaps the same will happen for Publish2.