<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Do blog networks need VC money?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:04:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Do blog networks need VC money?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/11/do-blog-networks-need-vc-money/#comment-1293499</link><description>Blog networks are pretty capital intensive operations ... the server costs must be immense.  I agree, the discussions among the participants is probably going to be the most interesting part of the conference.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tris Hussey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:04:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do blog networks need VC money?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/11/do-blog-networks-need-vc-money/#comment-1293497</link><description>Thanks for the comment, Jeremy.  I would have to agree that having a partner with money can often be a good thing  :-)  I think it depends on how you do it.  But it's certainly a fascinating discussion, which of course is why we have a whole panel devoted to it at mesh.  Looking forward to it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mathew</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:15:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do blog networks need VC money?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/11/do-blog-networks-need-vc-money/#comment-1293495</link><description>Mathew, thanks for the writeup. It is an interesting question. I think "need" is a bit strong, however there are a number of situations where having funds at your disposal make you more limber, better prepared and generally more stable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All the best, and can't wait for Mesh!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Wright</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:05:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>