<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Digg this: Google to gobble Digg?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/digg_this_google_to_gobble_digg_00/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:52:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Digg this: Google to gobble Digg?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/22/digg-this-google-to-gobble-digg/#comment-975053</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I also see that Google views Digg as a nice additional advertising property: it will place its ads on Digg and send extra traffic from Google News and Google Reader probably as well (using recommended subscriptions) so it will have a nice extra revenue source as well. And maybe it will finally make Digg itself more mainstream - something that Digg has been trying to achieve for some time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:52:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digg this: Google to gobble Digg?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/22/digg-this-google-to-gobble-digg/#comment-973269</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Did they just give up building there own? - &lt;a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-bucket-testing-new-digg-like-search-interface/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-bucket-testing-new-digg-like-search-interface/"&gt;http://www.techcrunch.com/2...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim A</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:34:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digg this: Google to gobble Digg?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/22/digg-this-google-to-gobble-digg/#comment-973037</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you're right--the combination of Google News and Digg might be a good one. The Google News algorithm works quite well, but adding a bit of humanity to the process might make the results more interesting/useful. Plus, without being integrated into something big (Google, NY Times, MSNBC, CNN, maybe Yahoo is still relevant enough), Digg has a pretty clear ceiling on its usefulness. Once anyone with a google login can play, the data will get a lot more interesting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google already does something Diggish on its search pages--results that get clicked on are valued higher than those that don't--but a more explicit voting system might be worth instituting there, too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jacob</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:56:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>