<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Did Edelman drop the ball on Wal-Mart?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/did_edelman_drop_the_ball_on_wal_mart/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:19:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Did Edelman drop the ball on Wal-Mart?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/16/did-edelman-drop-the-ball-on-wal-mart/#comment-1297321</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love this site.648142049&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">yfgewib</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:19:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Edelman drop the ball on Wal-Mart?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/16/did-edelman-drop-the-ball-on-wal-mart/#comment-1297317</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's here: &lt;a href="http://walmartingacrossamerica.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://walmartingacrossamerica.com/"&gt;http://walmartingacrossamer...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:10:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Edelman drop the ball on Wal-Mart?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/16/did-edelman-drop-the-ball-on-wal-mart/#comment-1297315</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where is this so-called fake blog? I can't seem to find it, though there is plenty of people talking about it. Do you have the link?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stuart MacDonald</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:08:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Edelman drop the ball on Wal-Mart?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/16/did-edelman-drop-the-ball-on-wal-mart/#comment-1297313</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, Tony.  At this point, it has become much more about Edelman's response, or lack thereof -- never the kind of position you want to be in as a PR company.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:25:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Edelman drop the ball on Wal-Mart?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/16/did-edelman-drop-the-ball-on-wal-mart/#comment-1297310</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Funny thing Mathew?&lt;br&gt;Edelman COULD have denied it all away -- there's certianly enough loose ends for plausible deniability.  Or maybe just mentioned something. ANYTHING.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My humble opinion (and really, what's that worth? :) is that the story is now LESS about Wal-Mart, and more about Edelman, and by extension Steve Rubel.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I mean, if there really wasn't anything going on -- if Working Families for Walmart did this on its own without Edelman's ok, well why not just say so?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How about saying anything?&lt;br&gt;Isn't that what PR firms do?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have a thought.  Maybe Steve Rubel was hypnotized into blogging about Google Maps this morning. ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;... hmmm ... maybe not. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:22:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>