http://mathewingram.disqus.com/enSat, 08 Dec 2007 11:39:16 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/07/deadpool-claims-another-victim-edgeio/#comment-29858It really seems like, for the "millions" of people that are online, the "millions" choose what is easy, most efficient, and, at this point, proven (like Craigslist) over things that seem complicated and ask too much of us (putting up an ad and *then* having the responsibility of tagging it in the *right* way.) <br><br>It all may come down to what I'm learning about web 2.0: we come here to find things, to interact with each other, and to be entertained--in different proportions at different times and often in our spare time. If we don't have time to figure something out, we just go away. Edgeio took too much time to figure out--so, we went away. And, without us, even the best idea won't fly.Tish GrierSat, 08 Dec 2007 11:39:16 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/07/deadpool-claims-another-victim-edgeio/#comment-29564A fair point :-)mathewiFri, 07 Dec 2007 21:26:02 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/07/deadpool-claims-another-victim-edgeio/#comment-29561But isn't that (infrastructure over product that proves itself) almost all of "Web 2.0"? And his main source of attention?<br><br>[Do you see why I tend to just say "Bah , humbug"? :-) ]Seth FinkelsteinFri, 07 Dec 2007 21:21:29 -0000