<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in David Foster Wallace, 1962-2008</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:33:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: David Foster Wallace, 1962-2008</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/14/david-foster-wallace-1962-2008/#comment-3859499</link><description>Thanks for pointing that out, Kris -- it's tragic no matter how you spell it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:33:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Foster Wallace, 1962-2008</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/14/david-foster-wallace-1962-2008/#comment-3165776</link><description>Thanks for some info about David</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Loss</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 02:28:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Foster Wallace, 1962-2008</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/14/david-foster-wallace-1962-2008/#comment-2356154</link><description>Yeah, thanks for the post, but I gotta agree-- Dave Eggers doesn't hold  a candle to DWF.  Not even close.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MWR</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:55:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Foster Wallace, 1962-2008</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/14/david-foster-wallace-1962-2008/#comment-2348657</link><description>It is a sad day.  Thank you for the post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But "almost on par with David Eggers’ incredible book"???  This is like saying Coltrane is "almost on par with the Backstreet Boys."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 15:15:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>