Hello! Mathew's comments is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.
Community Page
- www.mathewingram.com/work Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- I found your blog while I'm surfing the net. It's an interesting blog, I've added your blog to my favorites.
- I found your blog while I'm surfing the net. It's an interesting blog, I've added your blog to my favorites.
- It's a real shame that an area that could revolutionise radio as we know it (FM/AM) is being squashed like this. Internet radio allows very niche services to operate and be listened to by the...
- What a useful post here. Very informative for me..TQ friends... Cheers, <a href="http://sain-web.com" rel="nofollow">Buat Duit Dengan Blog</a>
- "1. Just because the New York Times does something doesn't make it right. 2. Describing something as a rumour, or putting it in the form of a question, doesn't make it OK to...
Jump to original thread »
Mike Arrington has a post up at TechCrunch about Parakey, the embryonic startup that featured Mozilla whiz-kid Blake Ross as a co-founder. According to Mike, some of the VCs who put money into Parakey are miffed that they only got cash after Facebook bought Parakey, while Ross and his co-found
... Continue reading »
1 year ago
(hip hop beat in background)
1 year ago
They get cash gain of 2 million. Their fund is worth 600 Million. The % Gain is minuscule for the fund.
And they were offered no shares in facebook. Which by today's numbers the valuation would have been 10 Times the price of the FB Round in June last year... (according to the Microsoft 1% for 100 Million).
So yeah. They can be pissed. They shouldn't have sold out, but i think its more of a case of the head developer saying he'll walk in any event and they should just take what they cold get.