<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Craigslist &amp;#8212; a giant cash machine</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/craigslist_8212_a_giant_cash_machine/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:22:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Craigslist &amp;#8212; a giant cash machine</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/16/craigslist-a-giant-cash-machine/#comment-1297548</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's a good point, Anuvinder. Craig has really stuck to his knitting, as the finance types like to say. Contrast that with, say, Friendster.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:22:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Craigslist &amp;#8212; a giant cash machine</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/16/craigslist-a-giant-cash-machine/#comment-1297546</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Craigslist is a wonderful service and has been running a really tight ship like in the old days-no VC Funding, no frivolous expenses, no redundant staff. It's a model on how to focus on your business and ignore the noise (VC funding, shinnier corporate offices, increased headcount etc). Perhaps a number of Web 2.0 companies (or other startups) should take note- Do you really need that additional $10 mn or can your little mashup work without the dose of additional capital and the "corrupting influences" it brings!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anuvinder Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:31:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Craigslist &amp;#8212; a giant cash machine</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/16/craigslist-a-giant-cash-machine/#comment-1297544</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for pointing that out, Sulemaan -- I've changed the post.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And Haydn, I think you are right about changes affecting the community, and that being a major risk if someone tried to push the money thing too far, and I think Craig realizes that. However, the changes so far don't seem to have hurt -- if anything, they have actually improved the service by decreasing spam.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:16:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Craigslist &amp;#8212; a giant cash machine</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/16/craigslist-a-giant-cash-machine/#comment-1297542</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Matthew, I have my doubts. Craig is very conscious of nurturing a community around the list and doing only what the community wants done. Of course he could earn more but look at why he is charging now in those cities - to improve the community experience. My guess is if he went for the dollars his community, in part, would leave, maybe not enough to wreck the business but to do significant damage to the ehtos.  Thre might be an important lesson about the limits of long term profitability in Craig's List.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">haydn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 04:37:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Craigslist &amp;#8212; a giant cash machine</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/16/craigslist-a-giant-cash-machine/#comment-1297540</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Matthew,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Love reading your work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One little thing.  The link at the end of your article from Reuters states that Craiglist actually has 22 employees versus the 14 you note in your posting.  (Not that 8 or another 80 will make a difference to their P&amp;amp;L given the projected revenues...)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sulemaan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 01:22:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>