<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Craiglist vs. craigslist blogger, round three</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 12:46:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Craiglist vs. craigslist blogger, round three</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/05/craiglist-vs-craigslist-blogger-round-three/#comment-10565836</link><description>an alternative to the adult content on Craigslist is &lt;a href="http://www.j812.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.j812.net&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jebartle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 12:46:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Craiglist vs. craigslist blogger, round three</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/05/craiglist-vs-craigslist-blogger-round-three/#comment-3206935</link><description>Craigslist is just getting way too big headed for what they are . Sure you have free classifieds, but there are a lot of free classified sites out there with half the egos</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">james</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:29:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Craiglist vs. craigslist blogger, round three</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/05/craiglist-vs-craigslist-blogger-round-three/#comment-304102</link><description>I didn't have a problem with the original communication. It was a little bit lawyerly and cold of course, but isn't that the point? I suppose they *might* have caught more flies with the proverbial honey by offering to move them over to alternate URL (perhaps?), but the point was to basically scare squatters (in craigslist's view -- and I think they have a pretty good case) off their land, right? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I get the feeling -- particularly in learning about the misleading text ads -- that Tim and co. wouldn't have been so friendly toward any suggestions from craigslist.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Berlin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 11:30:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Craiglist vs. craigslist blogger, round three</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/05/craiglist-vs-craigslist-blogger-round-three/#comment-303981</link><description>Matthew, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Caigslist shouldn't have any claim to the &lt;a href="http://craigslistblog.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;craigslistblog.org&lt;/a&gt; and should have lost all claims to the &lt;a href="http://craigslist.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;craigslist.org&lt;/a&gt; domain when they turned for profit, *way back*, (unfortunately the dot org domain remains unregulated so craigslist still gets away with redirecting traffic from &lt;a href="http://craigslist.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;craigslist.com&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href="http://craigslist.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;craigslist.org&lt;/a&gt; continuing to give the appearance that craigslist is still a non-profit).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Delia</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Delia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:35:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>