<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in CoverItLive looks like a worthy app</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/coveritlive_looks_like_a_worthy_app/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:48:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: CoverItLive looks like a worthy app</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/13/coveritlive-looks-like-a-worthy-app/#comment-76397</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, it's probably not a huge market.  Cool app though.  I think&lt;br&gt;even a newspaper or two could make use of it  :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:48:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CoverItLive looks like a worthy app</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/13/coveritlive-looks-like-a-worthy-app/#comment-76327</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The question is the size of the live-blogging market. Frankly, I don't think it's that big. But for bloggers who are keen to do it, CIO looks interesting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Evans</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:17:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>