<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Comments &amp;#8212; the new search frontier</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/comments_8212_the_new_search_frontier/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:30:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Comments &amp;#8212; the new search frontier</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/29/comments-the-new-search-frontier/#comment-1291623</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree Mark -- it does make it more interesting.  I often find the comments at other websites as useful or more useful than the item they're responding to -- I wish I could say the same for the comments I get on my columns at the Globe  :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:30:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comments &amp;#8212; the new search frontier</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/29/comments-the-new-search-frontier/#comment-1291622</link><description>&lt;p&gt;mathew,&lt;br&gt;now, this is an interesting idea. i like how you engage the people who comment on your posts. it can make an even interesting conversation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Evans</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:59:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>