<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Citizendium &amp;#8212; the clash of the experts</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:07:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Citizendium &amp;#8212; the clash of the experts</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/21/citizendium-the-clash-of-the-experts/#comment-1295836</link><description>That's a fair point, Michael -- although things could get Balkanized that way too, could they not?  In any case, thanks for the comment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:07:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Citizendium &amp;#8212; the clash of the experts</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/21/citizendium-the-clash-of-the-experts/#comment-1295834</link><description>There is no reason why there only has to be one fork in Wikipedia.  There is no technical necessity for there being "the set" of experts.  We could each, feasibliy, choose our own forks of Wikipedia, viist other forks, and just see what evolves.  Perhaps from the long tail of the varities of Wikipedia will rise a particularly interesting article.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michael webster</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:36:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>