<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Buying things isn&amp;#8217;t the hard part</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:15:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Buying things isn&amp;#8217;t the hard part</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/21/buying-things-isnt-the-hard-part/#comment-1314770</link><description>Agred. It might be worth revisiting what Steve Jobs had to do at Apple to get them back on their feet. It's easy to point at the new products but there was a lot of project-killing as in the Newton, stopping the clones, and winnowing down the products to a matrix. At the time many of those moves seemed dangerous and angered people (especially the employees whose projects were axed) but maybe some bold moves are in order at Yahoo!. I think, sadly, you know what I'm hinting at...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">webomatica</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:15:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Buying things isn&amp;#8217;t the hard part</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/21/buying-things-isnt-the-hard-part/#comment-1314769</link><description>Like you stated if the numberrs actually stand up the deal is great for Yahoo as long as they don't mess things up to much (real revenue-good stuff). The very focused audience is great for ad sales. They'll save some decent cash on the back-end tech costs since Yahoo should easily be able to incorporate that into their network.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Butler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:46:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>