-
Website
http://www.mathewingram.com/work -
Original page
http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/18/blogs-that-have-comments-are-better/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
scrawledinwax
23 comments · 1 points
-
webomatica
35 comments · 5 points
-
howardlindzon
46 comments · 69 points
-
JoeDuck
57 comments · 1 points
-
Karoli
32 comments · 39 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
In defence of newspapers and serendipity
3 weeks ago · 43 comments
-
Are independent bloggers an endangered species?
2 weeks ago · 8 comments
-
Bloggers, trust, MSM and correction fluid
1 week ago · 2 comments
-
Why media outlets want Facebook Connect
2 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
First Read: Follow the Breadcrumbs : CJR
2 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
In defence of newspapers and serendipity
-- Stuart
And thanks, Stu.
I think there's a deeper point here -- that is, the difference between publishing and conversational media. Blogging tools can be used for publishing (which is what Boing Boing generally does), or to support active conversation. And there's a pretty big gray area in between, too.
When making the distinction you're trying to make, I personally don't think it's useful to focus on "blogs" per se.
Blogs are not the point.
What's so exciting about blogs is that they can be used (especially when they allow comments) as a fairly accessible form of conversational media. Yes, they also can be used for publishing, which (I agree with you) is less exciting. So talking about "blogs" and "blogging" in this sense doesn't get to the heart of the matter. Let's not lose the forest for the trees -- or the purpose for the tools, for that matter.
IMHO, of course ;-)
- Amy Gahran
RightConversation.com
Contentious.com
Mathew