DISQUS

Mathew's comments: Blogs are so over, Wired magazine says

  • ianbetteridge · 1 year ago
    Totally on the mark, Mathew. I keep having to make the same point about print and online: it's not either/or, it's everything as appropriate.

    But then again, telling people to use their judgement and choose the best way to communicate is a lot less catchy than saying "if you don't do it this way, you're a loser".
  • floozyspeak · 1 year ago
    Interesting commentary but I think what Wired was getting at was more the general option that you have these days vs what you had back in 2004. Nowadays if you want to be part of the web and have a voice and what not you no longer need to solely depend on having a blog. Vlogging is no longer an odd obscure sect of the scene and is driving alot of innovation and adoption via concepts like QIK, JustinTV trend, YouTube enabled devices like cameras you buy that scream "hey I can connect to youtube right now!". Take this trend and connect it to microblogging via Twitter, Pownce or even as far as to say connecting it to microblogs and you start to see alot of options out there to get your word out. I guess it depends on what you wanted to get out of the web. But clearly the blog isn't your only option any more. You could own a YouTube channel, stream video all day long with QIK or Kyte, or Ustream, or follow the crowd on twitter and assult your peers 140 characters at a time. A blog is hard work compared to micro conversations.

    Of course Wired is going to a stand of all or nothing, they know how to sell a headline and be assured at getting a few hundred thousand hits.

    Theres different kinds of consumers and creators in the web these days. Not all will fit the blog profile, some will hate Twitter, and wouldn't even dare to think about video streaming their life. There's a place for everyone but one thing is for certain it isn't just about blogs any more.
  • davefleet · 1 year ago
    Spot-on, Mathew. I totally agree.

    There are two big holes in the article: (1) Pauls
    case focuses around narrow, dubious case studies and (2) he assumes that only trolls exist out there now. Not only is that inaccurate but it basically dismisses everyone on the evidence of a few bad apples.

    There are certainly more options available online now than in 2004. That doesn't mean the 'older' tools (which aren't really old) are irrelevant yet.

    Pure link/flamebait.
  • Joe Szabo · 1 year ago
    Biting, brilliant and a lovely undertone of sarcasm. One your your best posts to date.
  • antje wilsch · 1 year ago
    Mathew, sarcastic?? Never......
  • mathewi · 1 year ago
    :-)
  • Revital · 1 year ago
    Nicely written. The post by Boutin is a joke.
  • Wendell · 1 year ago
    Didn't we go through all this about 8 months ago? (I think it was a NYT article then, maybe.)

    :P
  • fredwilson · 1 year ago
    i use all these tools. blogging, tumblogging, twittering, facebooking, flickring, disqusing, etc, etc

    each is good for something unique and worth doing if you've got the time and inclination

    and that's not going to change anytime soon
  • Shelley · 1 year ago
    Excellent, Mathew.
  • mathewi · 1 year ago
    Thanks, Shelley.
  • Don Kosin · 1 year ago
    Man you sound bittar!
  • Jay Cuthrell · 1 year ago
    This made me want to start blogging again.
  • Tish Grier · 1 year ago
    yeah, I'll admit...I'm a sucker for some good linkbait, and this was a big, fat juicy one! besides, I needed a little typing practice this morning ;-)
  • elliottng · 1 year ago
    Agree. Paul's original post was well summarized in his 140 char Tweet. Why am I even wasting time commenting?
  • mathewi · 1 year ago
    Good point, Elliott -- and just think, your somewhat existential comment only took 108 characters or so :-)
  • Ryan · 1 year ago
    Interesting as Wired is so 2003... No credibility to make such claims, should have put it in his personal blog.
  • leigh · 1 year ago
    I hear print is so 1950's.

    Actually i think what's really happening is that blogs are becoming so integrated in the digital landscape most people are differentiating anymore. My mom thinks she's never been to a blog ('cepting mine...of course) but then she'll show me a recipe and I'll be like, mom, that's a blog.

    As for flamebait, that's too bad. Wired has had some really great content lately. Don't think BS and stupidity really does much for their brand overall (although maybe they are that desperate for some more higher impressions???!?...)
  • Mark Wallace · 1 year ago
    Great post. I appreciate your sarcasm. Blogging isn't going anywhere for some time much like Wired will still offer a print magazine.

    The best way to maximize marketing effectiveness is to use as many tools as possible.
  • George Nimeh · 1 year ago
    Definitely linkbait.

    The irony is, of course, that the story is posted on Wired's blog. What's even more ridiculous is that Paul Boutin writes for Valleywag. Essentially, this is a gossip blogger writing about how bad blogging is because there is so much gossip and crap on blogs.

    Less flame-like thoughts here:
    http://www.i-boy.com/weblog/2008/10/paul-boutin...

    ~G~
  • Johanna · 1 year ago
    I did too, ha. Noah Brier linked me to the Virtual Economics post, which brought me here and to SmoothSpan. Makes me think this was just one big experiment, rather than being serious...
  • Cris Cohen · 1 year ago
    It sounds like Boutin is just lazy. Yes, there are bad blogs out there. There are bad examples of everything out there: twitter pages, Facebook pages, books, movies, albums, etc. It will always be that way. But if you take the time and put in a little effort, you can find great blogs out there.
  • vanhoosear · 1 year ago
    Wow. I thought the "Death of ..." meme was SO 2006. Guess I was wrong. In two days both blogs AND RSS have been declared dead.

    Poppycock. I've been wanting to use that word all day. There it is.

    I don't know what to say except "utterly ridiculous."
  • Barry Welford · 1 year ago
    I read this morning that Britney is now tweating and blogging. If true, clearly blogging is the place to be
  • Fuc K uoy · 1 year ago
    lol! wow, blogs are so over in a blog! real smart there. BTW, dont think that way, digg your blog, or get a stumble and you site will have much more comments. Finally, make the site contriversial
  • Chris Baskind · 1 year ago
    Yes, I rather think Wired's linkbaiting rather disproves their point. In any case, I don't see them rushing to push their enterprise off Wired.com to Facebook and Twitter. ;-)

    You didn't "fall for" anything, though. You've done what bloggers do: you've had your say. And we've enjoyed reading.
  • mathewi · 1 year ago
    Thanks, Chris.
  • AGORACOM - George · 1 year ago
    Yet another example of an out of touch / bored / Silicon Valley / Web 2.0 / elitist techie that does not have the faintest clue about the masses who, for the most part, neither fully understand blogging, nor understand a thing about Twitter ... yet.

    Regards,
    The Greek
  • erica · 1 year ago
    People are about wanting their thoughts to be there and available immediately. Facebook and Twitter allow this sort of thing to happen where as it takes time, thought and work into putting a blog together, which is something most people aren't willing to do. We're all about instant satisfaction and it's sad to see how many people's lives are becoming so much like the instantaneous results like Facebook. It seems people now a days put the more time and effort into the short thoughts and relationships on facebook than they do in real relationships, friendly or romantic.
  • compassioninpolitics · 1 year ago
    This made me loose it:

    >>>@WiredReader: Kill yr blog. 2004 over. Google won’t find you. Too much cruft from HuffPo, NYT. Commenters are tards. C u on Facebook?”

    The tools work together and it isn't always an absolute numbers game.
    It is sad, however, that you can just write useful or passionate or creative posts and not
    get noticed on Google.

    As this generation graduates and CNN and other media outlets engage blogs, I believe they will experience a resurgence.

    Your prose is on point. Fantastic post!
  • Mushi · 1 year ago
    Right on, I totally agree with nyou
  • lukehardiman · 1 year ago
    Paul's weak-ass link bait clarifies exactly why blogging might not be an option for him.
  • thomdahl · 9 months ago
    Hehe, I liked the update part, I do not agree to the claim about the death of blogs. Blogs are here to stay and grow, but he's probably right that the era of naïve and grassroots blogging by amateurs is long gone and it's being professionalized (if that's a word).

    In Denmark, where I live, blogs are only beginning to become rich and important sources for inspiration and information and I see a lot of people using their blogs for exciting things that the facebook platform or twitter is too sterile for. Blogs are a format for easy publishing, not a hype like facebook "Which Pizza are you?" apps...
  • melishefner · 8 months ago
    :)

    Great post

    It couldn't be that any one would want a blog to simply-write!
  • sam · 7 months ago
    But a lot of the info that people are posting on twitter or on facebook are information written on people's blogs?
  • Omar1 · 6 months ago
    This post is just hype. The issue is not blogs vs social media sites. It's beyond that.
  • Dual Sim Mobile · 1 week ago
    nice