Community Page
- www.mathewingram.com/work Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- I look forward to seing the outcome at the end of this.
- The internet is shaping and evolving so fast, but people take a long time to change their ways.
- life is just so fragile, we shoud never take it for granted.
- It is very sad, I have a freind who is dying of cancer. She however can do nothing much except sleep at the moment.
- Hi Mathew, I'm glad you finally got an iPhone. I remember you mentioning you wanted one but had a Blackberry for work. I'm a big fan of the Panorama application... and Bejeweled 2.
Jump to original thread »
This may or may not be part of the “secret sauce” in Gabe’s memeorandum.com, but I think Stowe Boyd is onto something. In a post about what makes blogs work — i.e., what makes them vibrant and helps them grow, as opposed to stagnating or becoming
... Continue reading »
3 years ago
looks like you're addressing the perplexing issue of how blogs get ranked? one thing i've tried to tackle is how the cream gets risen to the top, and how one would define "cream". for what it's worth, the blogosphere is what it is, i think. you find the blogs you like, you blogroll, link and trackback to them, and that's all you can do.
3 years ago
I do think the conversational index idea is a good one though. Like Steve Rubel, I often find that the best stuff is in the comments.
3 years ago
This all part of the tendency to consider a "blog" as something somehow out in a mysterious space like an asteroid, entirely distinct from the person who writes it and their social network.
Consider:
"If a person is well -connected and has a large social network, their blog is likely to flourish. If they aren't known and popular, their blog is likely to be ignored".
Would that be much of surprise?
But invert it - and it's hailed as a revelation.
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
Mathew