<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Associated Press: In a hole, still digging</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:15:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Associated Press: In a hole, still digging</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/16/associated-press-in-a-hole-still-digging/#comment-690834</link><description>Totally agree -- it seems like a foot-shooting type of effort, in a lot of ways.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:15:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Associated Press: In a hole, still digging</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/16/associated-press-in-a-hole-still-digging/#comment-690526</link><description>Forget about the legal issue, for a sec. From a strategic point of view, in the context of a print newspaper industry that is absolutely dying and putting the AP under all kinds of financial pressure, isn't it extra bizarre that they don't see this free promotion of their content with links back to their web site as beneficial?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ampressman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:41:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Associated Press: In a hole, still digging</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/16/associated-press-in-a-hole-still-digging/#comment-687574</link><description>Contrarian as always, Paul  :-)  And I would agree, provided there's a&lt;br&gt;genuine issue of competition or injury to their ability to sell the&lt;br&gt;content.  But do you really think that's the case with something like&lt;br&gt;the Drudge Retort?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:09:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Associated Press: In a hole, still digging</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/16/associated-press-in-a-hole-still-digging/#comment-686913</link><description>Not to be all Nick Carr-ish about this, but I'm totally fine with AP's decision. It's their content, and they should feel free to coop it up however they see fit. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do I think it's smart though? No.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Kedrosky</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:30:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>