DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! Mathew's comments is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

Mathew's comments

Jump to original thread »
Author

Ars Technica snapped up by Conde Nast

Started by mathewi · 1 year ago

On the heels of CBS acquiring CNET for $1.8-billion comes another deal involving “old” media and “new” media: according to TechCrunch, the folks over at Conde Nast — the magazine publishing family that owns Vogue, the New Yorker and ... Continue reading »

9 comments

  • Sal

    1 year ago

    Congrats to the Ars guys. I think they deserve it, and here's hoping that Conde Naste doesn't come in and screw it up. I think it's fair to say that Reddit hasn't been screwed up by Conde Nast, yet. Harder to imagine how it might effect a content company however!
    reply
  • mathewi

    1 year ago

    I actually think Conde Nast is not a bad fit for Ars. I think it and
    Wired should be able to work pretty well together. In a lot of ways,
    Ars is kind of like a magazine anyway -- it just doesn't have a
    printed version.
    reply
  • calvin pearson

    1 year ago

    Am still waitng for Arrington to write this one: "Why Conde bought Ars, and not the other way around?"

    more seriously, this one is bizarre. ars isn't very relevant and conde is limited when it comes to the high tech space. the cbs/cnet deal which you trashed (unfairly, imho) yesterday appears to make for a far more powerful combination.
    reply
  • mathewi

    1 year ago

    Calvin, I don't see how you can say Ars isn't very relevant and Conde
    Nast doesn't have much depth in tech -- and I guess we'll just have to
    disagree about CBS and CNET.
    reply
  • Lucas Gonze

    1 year ago

    $36 CPM is very very rich. Even if they get that on some page views, they don't have 100% sell through at that rate.
    reply
  • mathewi

    1 year ago

    That's a fair point, Lucas. Those are pretty high CPMs for a site like
    Ars, and assuming they get that for every page view is probably
    overstating things. That said, however, I looked at TechCrunch and saw
    that Ars has about four times as many page views, and I had seen an
    estimate somewhere that TC was making about $600,000 a month, so I
    thought I was in the right ballpark revenue-wise.
    reply
  • Eric Berlin

    1 year ago

    Agree with Lucas -- that was my first thought: $36 CPM seems awfully high. Perhaps they get it for a limited amount of inventory but can't imagine it's across -the-board.

    Also agree with Mathew that Ars could be a good fit for Conde -- they're putting together a pretty interesting digital portfolio.
    reply
  • sevin malony

    1 year ago

    saw the 24/7 "analysis". assuming it's right - and i very much doubt those numbers reflect reality - then, folk,s we're back to the bubblicious days. but hey, if ars or any of these other sites can find a buyer, more power to them. nothing wrong with being greedy if some dope is begging to give you their money. but c'mon, we've been here before. or has everyone in the world forgotten the "battle for eyeballs" back a few years ago.

    anyway, pass the bong and inhale deeply. and the band played on
    reply
  • Dan Matan

    1 year ago

    I've been an Ars member since '99. Although the news side of things is very well done, the forums are where it's at (and seemingly where a lot of the current editors have been tapped from).

    Over the past year or two, they've done a really good job on getting onto Slashdot and Google News with their well written articles, which presumably added a lot of value/eyeballs.

    I'd imagine that the forums, the root of the community, don't create much ad revenue (and they might lose a lot of their for-pay subs and for-pay premium subbers). But it probably could if they decided to go with annoying in-your-face adverts.

    Only time will tell, here's to another good 8.5 years.
    reply

Add New Comment

Returning? Login