Hello! Mathew's comments is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.
Community Page
- www.mathewingram.com/work Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- I found your blog while I'm surfing the net. It's an interesting blog, I've added your blog to my favorites.
- I found your blog while I'm surfing the net. It's an interesting blog, I've added your blog to my favorites.
- It's a real shame that an area that could revolutionise radio as we know it (FM/AM) is being squashed like this. Internet radio allows very niche services to operate and be listened to by the...
- What a useful post here. Very informative for me..TQ friends... Cheers, <a href="http://sain-web.com" rel="nofollow">Buat Duit Dengan Blog</a>
- "1. Just because the New York Times does something doesn't make it right. 2. Describing something as a rumour, or putting it in the form of a question, doesn't make it OK to...
Jump to original thread »
Scott Karp, the managing director of research and strategy for Atlantic Media, seems to have a way of writing things that get under my skin. First he said that bloggers have it all wrong when it comes to the “new” media, and that the vision of people choosing and even h
... Continue reading »
3 years ago
- New way to lose weight: stay in the dark!
- Police Computers Clash With Dunkin' Donuts System
- Iceland the First Country to Try Abandoning Gasoline
Now there's a killer app. I mean really, you can't seriously argue that this is useful. Cool, fun, sure. But is this really the best way to spend my limited media time?
Flickr and eBay are successful not based on ease of use, but because they give people an easier way to do something that was hard to do. How does reading Digg solve my information overload problem?
I'm not trying to push to the other extreme -- the Globe and Mail is a great example of middle ground -- I see news I can use presented in a user-friendly way, with the opportunity to comment if the spirit moves me.
Can't promise I won't get under your skin again, but I do enjoy the conversation (I'm geeky that way).
3 years ago
would it be if everyone agreed all the time? :-) And I hear what
you're saying about media overload -- believe me, if anyone is
interested in there still being a market for filters and synthesizers,
it's me. But I also think people are more adaptable than we give them
credit for -- when they see something they're interested in.
Who would have thought that something like Flickr would have taken off
the way it has, even though it takes a fair bit of work to understand?
And you are right that it and eBay give people an easy way to do
something that used to be hard. But I think Web 2.0 apps can too (and
Digg might not be the best example) and that is to find things that
interest them. Newspapers and other "old" media don't make that as
easy as they should -- in fact they routinely make it a lot harder
than it should be, and some of that is just the nature of the media.
But I think that's the itch that the Web can scratch.
Thanks for the comment, and for taking my jabs so well. Let's keep
this conversation going.
3 years ago
[URL=http://s3.phpbbforfree.com/forums/index.php?mforum=kkarsha]adipex[/URL] [URL=http://vvarder.cba.pl/adipex.html]adipex[/URL] [URL=http://vvarder.cba.pl/alprazolam.html]alprazolam[/URL]