<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in AP battle over, copyright war still on</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:06:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: AP battle over, copyright war still on</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/20/ap-battle-over-copyright-war-still-on/#comment-720492</link><description>Some blogger is going to have take the risk of losing a lawsuit to get this settled. Bob Cox discussed this in his interview on BlogWorld Radio today: &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://snurl.com/2l7vi" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://snurl.com/2l7vi&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick Calvert</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:06:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AP battle over, copyright war still on</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/20/ap-battle-over-copyright-war-still-on/#comment-719808</link><description>This copyfight has 3 losers. AP, Rodgers, and the rest of us.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rodger's victory is his alone. It does not apply to you or I. Rodger's conformance, compliance, or capitulation, is his alone. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Which is the best thing out of this copyfight. Following any guideline by any organization over 'Fair Use' is not legal, and to some, may be construed as a threat to Free Speech. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't get weird on me now, There Are Lawyers Involved.  Why do you think the largest repository of DMCA Takedown Notices is called Chilling Effects? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AP loses because they will need a bunch more lawyers  to file DMCA notices, because unless they go back to the teletype, and have their owner-members erect paywalls,  it will be quoted. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the AP saying 'quoting  a headline and the lede paragraph of a story' is infringement is crap. It is AP's attempt to maintain control over it's writing style, with a headline and first paragraph, the hook and the  summary, with the rest of the story explaining the first 'graf'. They would really like to make this a guideline, as if you quote that, the story is basically over, you have the sizzle and the  steak, the rest is fat and bone. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As mentioned at various places around the web, copyright infringement by disagreement over Fair Use takes place in a courtroom. This is the 4 factors test. &lt;br&gt;It sucks, it does not resolve the  issue, and it will happen again and again. &lt;br&gt;And we will all get up in their faces. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Robert Cox and the Media Bloggers Association gets an atta boy for his work in resolving this specific issue, &lt;a href="http://www.mediabloggers.org/robert-cox/back-story-ap-and-drudge-retort-come-to-terms" rel="nofollow"&gt;Back Story on How AP and Drudge Retort Come to Terms&lt;/a&gt;  especially in the speed of getting a large organization like the AP to make a decision without months of meetings, focus groups, and balloting,  but gets a big aw sh*t for trying to sell us insurance, regardless of his statement of no commission.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The rest of us lose because this issue because Fair Use is not a quantity or percentage issue, and in the vast majority of cases is not commercial issue. We could turn off the web.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">headlemur</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:47:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>