<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in An expose on telecom bait-and-switch</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/an_expose_on_telecom_bait_and_switch/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 02:47:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: An expose on telecom bait-and-switch</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/31/an-expose-on-telecom-bait-and-switch/#comment-1292249</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I was sort of interested as well, but the pre-release comments I've seen all make the point that this guy was a bystander. He was neither one of the criminal telecom analysts sorts, nor was he really privy to all that much good, juicy venality. Where's the fun in reading that?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul K.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 02:47:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An expose on telecom bait-and-switch</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/31/an-expose-on-telecom-bait-and-switch/#comment-1292247</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But, but... they seem like such nice guys, ya know? With their suits and little phones and what not?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;;-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-- Stuart&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stuart MacDonald</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:06:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>