<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Amazon patent foiled by lone gunman</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:45:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Amazon patent foiled by lone gunman</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/17/amazon-patent-foiled-by-lone-gunman/#comment-1316435</link><description>Because I was focused on my $10 Mathew....duh….&lt;br&gt;(which i am happy to say after email number 20, they decided to make an exception and give back to me)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:45:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amazon patent foiled by lone gunman</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/17/amazon-patent-foiled-by-lone-gunman/#comment-1316436</link><description>Fabulous story!  I had no sooner finished ranting about Google's frivolous search widget patent and using Amazon's 1-click as an example than I heard about this on ycombinator:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/google-patents-search-engine-partnerships-and-my-idea-doh/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/goog...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think patents should be at least partially a function of the cost of developing the idea and less a function of who happened to slam an application through on an obvious idea soonest.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob Warfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:37:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amazon patent foiled by lone gunman</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/17/amazon-patent-foiled-by-lone-gunman/#comment-1316437</link><description>So why didn't you get to work and crack their patent, Leigh?  :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:57:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amazon patent foiled by lone gunman</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/17/amazon-patent-foiled-by-lone-gunman/#comment-1316438</link><description>"Fueled by an unsatisfactory experience buying something on the website"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ha!  For any clients that think one customer can't make a difference in their lives.  I wonder if he got the same ditsy customer service agent that I did when i started my "give leigh her 10$ back Amazon.com" campaign years ago?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:54:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>