<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Amanda goes boom on HBO and ABC</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 06:14:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Amanda goes boom on HBO and ABC</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/14/amanda-goes-boom-on-hbo-and-abc/#comment-1302789</link><description>Well, that was my point.  It's really a talent scout for modelling agencies kind thing.  Well, models who can read.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Hyndman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 06:14:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amanda goes boom on HBO and ABC</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/14/amanda-goes-boom-on-hbo-and-abc/#comment-1302788</link><description>I think it's more than just the idea that attractive people are sought after for video things, Rob -- I think in many ways the Web is taking its place alongside other outlets (like community television and local TV weather reports) as a source of those attractive people. Not exactly a breakthrough in journalism, perhaps  :-)  But interesting nevertheless.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:52:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amanda goes boom on HBO and ABC</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/14/amanda-goes-boom-on-hbo-and-abc/#comment-1302785</link><description>I must admit, I'm not really seeing anything to this, other than the unsurprising lesson that attractive people are sought after for video spokes-gigs.  Oh, that and that magazines sell better when they cover celebrities, of whatever grade.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Hyndman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:06:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>