<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in A look at Sharpcast&amp;#8217;s photo software</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/a_look_at_sharpcast8217s_photo_software/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:33:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A look at Sharpcast&amp;#8217;s photo software</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/13/a-look-at-sharpcasts-photo-software/#comment-1296583</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I do, Anuvinder -- and I have been for awhile now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:33:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A look at Sharpcast&amp;#8217;s photo software</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/13/a-look-at-sharpcasts-photo-software/#comment-1296581</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mathew, this is great stuff for your blog as well as mainstream newspaper readers. Do you plan to cover Web 2.0 from a Canadian perspective?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anuvinder Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:26:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>