<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in A breath of fresh air from Nick Denton</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/a_breath_of_fresh_air_from_nick_denton/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 08:55:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A breath of fresh air from Nick Denton</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/07/03/a-breath-of-fresh-air-from-nick-denton/#comment-1294234</link><description>&lt;p&gt;denton's pragmatic approach is certainly different from the recent moves made by om malik and paidcontent. that said, it's probably easier to make tough decisions when you already have a strong foundation to build upon. what's also interesting is clearly denton doesn't need the money so maybe gawker is part-business empire, part-experiment, part ego-vehicle.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Evans</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 08:55:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>